Adam Leitman Bailey Articles

Adam Leitman Bailey Articles

An online resource of real estate law articles

  • Home
  • Real Estate Q & A

Condominium Conversion Reserve Fund Obligations, Real Estate Weekly

  • Condominium & Cooperative Representation

Contents

  1. By Adam Leitman Bailey

By Adam Leitman Bailey

While sponsors of new construction condominiums have extensive obligations regarding the physical construction of their projects, Sponsors of condominium conversions really only have one material obligation (other than actually converting the form of ownership) — to provide sufficient funds to create reserves for capital repairs, improvements, and replacements required for the residents’ health and safety.

If sponsors do not properly fund these mandatory reserve funds, condos may not have sufficient capital to perform necessary remedial construction work, leaving buyers with potentially uninhabitable homes.

Discovering and prosecuting the underfunding can result in the recovery of hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars to unit owners and boards. Sponsors who file offering plans for the conversion of rental buildings to condominium ownership in New York City must comply with the so-called Reserve Fund Law.
This law mandates that sponsors of condominium conversion projects provide condominiums with reserve funds at least equal to statutorily calculated minimums.

Sponsors must provide a reserve fund in an amount no less than three percent of the total price of all of the units offered for sale, specifically, “[t]he sum of the cost of all units in the offering at the last price which was offered to tenants in occupancy prior to the effective date of the plan regardless of number of sales made.”

In order to properly calculate “Total Price”, a sponsor must (1) include the offering prices of all units offered for sale by an offering plan, and (2) use the offering prices according to the formula prescribed by the statute. The first part is self explanatory.

The second part of the calculation is more complicated, which makes it possible for a sponsor to use artificially lowered offering prices to reduce its reserve fund obligations, without the condominium board or unit owners ever realizing that a deception is taking place.

“Last price which was offered to tenants in occupancy prior to the effective date of the plan” literally means that sponsors must use the price it offered to tenants in occupancy the day immediately prior to the date the sponsor declared the offering plan effective.
There is no ambiguity in the statutory phrase — the words of the statute are clear and must be given their natural and plain meaning.

Rather than follow the literal and proper calculation of Total Price, sponsors may try to limit the amount of the reserve funds they deliver to condominiums by calculating Total Price based on the last discount price offered to tenants in occupancy instead of the actual last price.

Due to regulations regarding threshold sale requirements for offering plans to be declared effective, sponsors frequently offer tenants in occupancy discount rates during the mandatory ninety day exclusive sales period, during which only tenants in occupancy may sign purchase agreements for their units.
However, it is common that sponsors fail to meet the threshold sales requirements during the exclusive sales period with the result that the discount prices expire prior to the date the offering plans are declared effective. In these situations, the last price offered to tenants in occupancy is not the discounted exclusive insider price, but rather the price offered to outsiders, which is usually substantially higher.

Actually finding this discrepancy requires a bit of detective work. A typical condominium conversion goes thru numerous amendments. Any one of these amendments can reveal what the very last set of prices immediately prior to the effectiveness of the plan really was.

Although it is a criminal act to do so, sponsors looking to make their reserve fund obligations as small as possible base their calculations on the lower insider price tables, figures which are actually obsolete in most cases prior to the effectiveness of the plan.

Thus, they are relying on board attorneys’ and purchasers’ attorneys’ lack of thoroughness in checking all of the amendments to keep their low balling calculations hidden in plain sight.

The Reserve Fund Law provides sponsors of conversion projects with two different methods of funding the reserve fund of a condominium: (1) funding the entire reserve fund within 30 days after the first closing, or (2) funding the reserve fund over the course of five years with a “mandatory initial contribution.” The mandatory initial contribution must be established as a minimum of one percent of the Total Price.

In New York City condominium conversions, unit owners and boards should scrutinize their reserve funds to ensure that the condominium’s sponsor complied with the Reserve Fund Law because discovering and prosecuting underfunding can result in the recovery of substantial dollars to the condominium.

Read more about Adam Leitman Bailey

ARTICLES BY TOPIC

  • Appellate Litigation
  • Buyouts and Sale of Apartment Lease
  • Commercial Landlord Representation
  • Commercial Leasing Services
  • Commercial Tenant Representation
  • Condominium & Cooperative Board & Building Representation
  • Condominium & Cooperative Litigation
  • Condominium & Cooperative Owner & Shareholder Representation
  • Condominium & Cooperative Representation
  • Condominium/Board of Managers Representation of Newly Constructed Buildings & Conversions
  • Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR)
  • Fire and Building Violations
  • Foreclosure Litigation Group
  • Homeowner and Tenant Associations
  • Insurance Defense Litigation
  • Landlord Representation
  • About Mitchell-Lama/ Housing Development Fund Corporation (HDFC) & Third Party Transfer Representation
  • Mortgage Finance Practice Group
  • Purchase & Sale of Homes
  • Purchase and Sale of Multi-Family Dwellings and Buildings
  • Real Estate Administrative Proceedings/Environmental Control Board
  • Real Estate Litigation
  • Tenant Representation
  • Q & A
  • Title Insurance Claims Group

RECENT POSTS

  • Adam Leitman Bailey P.C. Obtains Summary Judgment Ruling Dismissing Complaint Seeking Payment Of Exterminator Fees Where No Contract Was Shown To Exist To Provide Authority For Such Payment
  • Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. Overcomes Son’s Succession Claim and Wins Holdover Proceeding and Monetary Judgment for Landlord After Trial
  • Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C., Wins Trial and $100,000 Monetary and Possessory Judgment in Residential Non-Payment Case, Overcoming Laches and Breach of Warranty of Habitability Defenses
  • Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. Secures Substantial Early Termination Payment for Tenant of Foreclosed Building in Receivership
  • Coop Board Forced To Obey The Law

TOP CONTRIBUTORS

Adam Leitman Bailey

Dov Treiman

John Desiderio
  • Popular
  • Comments
  • Tags
  • FDA’s Poison Prevention Packaging Rule: A Bitter Pill the FDA is Forced to Swallow
  • The New Rules of Seeking a Buyout of a Rent-Regulated Tenant
  • Rules Governing Anticipatory Repudiation of Contracts
  • New Rules of Substantial Rehabilitation to Remove Units from Rent Regulation Part II
  • Building Sold Before Violation Notice Issued
  • Public Health and Law : Assignment Essays | Assignment Essays: […] FDA’s Poison Prevention Packaging ...
  • Public Health and Law : Solution Essays - Solution Essays: […] FDA’s Poison Prevention Packaging ...
  • Who are the parties in the case and what are their respective interests? - Excelwriters: […] FDA’s Poison Prevention Packaging ...
  • Nutritional Health Alliance v. Food and Drug Administration - Longbeach Writers: […] FDA’s Poison Prevention Packaging ...
  • Public health and law | Law homework help – Hero Papers: […] FDA’s Poison Prevention Packaging ...
Adam Leitman Bailey apartment rent Appellate Division Case Co-op board member rights Co-op issues commercial landlord commercial lease commercial tenant condominium Condominium & Cooperative Representation contract cooperative board court of appeals Dov Treiman foreclosure Foreclosure law foreclosure litigation group Home purchase Insurance Jeffrey Metz John Desiderio landlord Landlord and tenant landlord law Landlord Representation Lease Lease Provision License Agreement Mortgage New Construction Representation nonprimary residence NY state law property owner Purchase & Sale of Homes Real estate real estate litigation rent Rent stabilization rent stabilized Rosemary Liuzzo Mohamed RPAPL tenant law tenant rights violation notice

Read more from Adam Leitman Bailey

Huffington Post

The Cooperator

Apartment Law Insider

Commercial Observer

Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C.

Twitter Twitter

Follow @alb_pc on Twitter

Twitter Twitter

Follow @Aleitmanbailey on Twitter

LinkedIn

Adam Leitman Bailey on LinkedIn

Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. on LinkedIn

Adam Leitman Bailey Articles © 2025. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes