Adam Leitman Bailey Articles

Adam Leitman Bailey Articles

An online resource of real estate law articles

  • Home
  • Real Estate Q & A

The Market Value Rider Mystery – Solved!

  • Purchase & Sale of Homes

By Rosemary Liuzzo Mohamed and Carly Clinton

When purchasing real property, an attorney  will almost always advise a purchaser to buy title insurance.  Although it is not legally required, title insurance serves to protect the purchaser from a defect in title post closing.  A defect in title arises when someone that was given prior ownership rights seeks to assert those rights against the current owner.  The owner’s policy will protect the purchaser against a dispute up to the purchase price of the property.

The most common misconception is that there is only one form of title insurance available for purchase.  In fact, there are different levels of coverage offered by all title companies.  When sitting at a closing table, a purchaser will be asked by the title company representative if they would like to purchase additional coverage.  In most cases, the purchaser’s attorney will advise the purchaser it is not needed,  the waiver is quickly signed and the transaction moves on.  However, it is important to know the additional coverage available to a purchaser. 

In New York, purchasers have the option to buy a “market value rider,” which is the highest level of title coverage a purchaser can obtain.  The market value rider will cover the fair market value of the property instead of the original purchase price.  This rider is important if it is believed there will be significant appreciation during the period of ownership.  The rider does not increase coverage for a rise in value resulting from renovations, capital improvements, or remodeling during the period of ownership.

The market value rider comes from Insurance law Section 6409, Subdivision C, which states, “every title insurance corporation shall offer, at or prior to title closing, an optional policy form that insures the title of owner-occupied real property used predominantly for residential purposes that consists of not more than four dwelling units for an amount equal to the market value of the property at the time a loss is discovered.” 

So when does purchasing the market value rider make sense?  For example, it is the year 2020 and the purchase price of your home is $1,000,000.00.  Ten years later in 2030 someone with prior ownership appears and is asserting a claim of ownership for your home.  Over the last ten years inflation has caused the value of your home to increase, and now the market value of your home is assessed at $1,500,000.00.  If the prior owner is found to in fact have ownership, your owner’s policy from your title company would only cover the purchase price paid in 2020, and you would be out the $500,000.00 that your home would potentially sell for in 2030 if placed on the market.  If you purchased a market value rider at your closing in 2020 at the time of the claim the title company would cover the market value in 2030, the full $1,500,000.00. 

The market value rider cost is in the form of a one time charge paid at closing which is usually 10% of the owner’s title insurance premium.  A few  hundred dollars extra paid at closing for the market value rider can provide the highest level of coverage against a future claim to title.

Most people may consider the market value rider an unnecessary expense, however, it is important to be an informed purchaser during any transaction.  A home may be the biggest purchase in one’s lifetime and the market value rider is something to consider for optimal coverage.  Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C.’s transactional department handles hundreds of closings a year and is available to fully explain the benefits of the market value rider to our clients.   

ARTICLES BY TOPIC

  • Appellate Litigation
  • Buyouts and Sale of Apartment Lease
  • Commercial Landlord Representation
  • Commercial Leasing Services
  • Commercial Tenant Representation
  • Condominium & Cooperative Board & Building Representation
  • Condominium & Cooperative Litigation
  • Condominium & Cooperative Owner & Shareholder Representation
  • Condominium & Cooperative Representation
  • Condominium/Board of Managers Representation of Newly Constructed Buildings & Conversions
  • Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR)
  • Fire and Building Violations
  • Foreclosure Litigation Group
  • Homeowner and Tenant Associations
  • Insurance Defense Litigation
  • Landlord Representation
  • About Mitchell-Lama/ Housing Development Fund Corporation (HDFC) & Third Party Transfer Representation
  • Mortgage Finance Practice Group
  • Purchase & Sale of Homes
  • Purchase and Sale of Multi-Family Dwellings and Buildings
  • Real Estate Administrative Proceedings/Environmental Control Board
  • Real Estate Litigation
  • Tenant Representation
  • Q & A
  • Title Insurance Claims Group

RECENT POSTS

  • Adam Leitman Bailey P.C. Obtains Summary Judgment Ruling Dismissing Complaint Seeking Payment Of Exterminator Fees Where No Contract Was Shown To Exist To Provide Authority For Such Payment
  • Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. Overcomes Son’s Succession Claim and Wins Holdover Proceeding and Monetary Judgment for Landlord After Trial
  • Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C., Wins Trial and $100,000 Monetary and Possessory Judgment in Residential Non-Payment Case, Overcoming Laches and Breach of Warranty of Habitability Defenses
  • Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. Secures Substantial Early Termination Payment for Tenant of Foreclosed Building in Receivership
  • Coop Board Forced To Obey The Law

TOP CONTRIBUTORS

Adam Leitman Bailey

Dov Treiman

John Desiderio
  • Popular
  • Comments
  • Tags
  • FDA’s Poison Prevention Packaging Rule: A Bitter Pill the FDA is Forced to Swallow
  • The New Rules of Seeking a Buyout of a Rent-Regulated Tenant
  • Rules Governing Anticipatory Repudiation of Contracts
  • New Rules of Substantial Rehabilitation to Remove Units from Rent Regulation Part II
  • Building Sold Before Violation Notice Issued
  • Public Health and Law : Assignment Essays | Assignment Essays: […] FDA’s Poison Prevention Packaging ...
  • Public Health and Law : Solution Essays - Solution Essays: […] FDA’s Poison Prevention Packaging ...
  • Who are the parties in the case and what are their respective interests? - Excelwriters: […] FDA’s Poison Prevention Packaging ...
  • Nutritional Health Alliance v. Food and Drug Administration - Longbeach Writers: […] FDA’s Poison Prevention Packaging ...
  • Public health and law | Law homework help – Hero Papers: […] FDA’s Poison Prevention Packaging ...
Adam Leitman Bailey apartment rent Appellate Division Case Co-op board member rights Co-op issues commercial landlord commercial lease commercial tenant condominium Condominium & Cooperative Representation contract cooperative board court of appeals Dov Treiman foreclosure Foreclosure law foreclosure litigation group Home purchase Insurance Jeffrey Metz John Desiderio landlord Landlord and tenant landlord law Landlord Representation Lease Lease Provision License Agreement Mortgage New Construction Representation nonprimary residence NY state law property owner Purchase & Sale of Homes Real estate real estate litigation rent Rent stabilization rent stabilized Rosemary Liuzzo Mohamed RPAPL tenant law tenant rights violation notice

Read more from Adam Leitman Bailey

Huffington Post

The Cooperator

Apartment Law Insider

Commercial Observer

Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C.

Twitter Twitter

Follow @alb_pc on Twitter

Twitter Twitter

Follow @Aleitmanbailey on Twitter

LinkedIn

Adam Leitman Bailey on LinkedIn

Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. on LinkedIn

Adam Leitman Bailey Articles © 2025. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes